Persuasive Marketing blog is a collection of inventive thinking, interesting articles and real life experiences shared by our consultants and clients.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Top 10 PR No-nos, Part II

Robert Mullins is a freelance technology writer in Silicon Valley. You can find him online at his Robert Mullins blog.

In my last post, I ticked off five ways PR people can tick off journalists. Now here are the other five, as collected by the Bad Pitch Blog:

5. You’ll be sorry. This hasn’t happened to me but I’ve heard it from other reporters that PR people have implied that they’re missing a great story by ignoring their pitch. Somehow, the theory goes, the reporter will be pulled into their editor’s or news director’s office the next day who’ll ask, “You HEARD about this story and didn’t follow up?” Bad Pitch says, “Good luck with that approach.”

4. One Bad Pitch poster bundled a number of miscellaneous no-nos, including “I told you I’d get the CEO, but…” The advice: never overpromise what you can deliver to the reporter. Another no-no, “I already pitched the Wall Street Journal but they said no.” This would be like Dick asking Jane out for dinner by explaining, “I really wanted to go out with Linda, but she turned me down.”

3. Can I review or edit this before it gets published? I still get this one. Here’s why reporters and editors don’t let sources see the story ahead of time. We don’t want them to see what we’ve attributed to them, have second thoughts about what they said and then try to change it. If the source said it, it stays in the story. There are a few instances in which I’ve shared portions of a story in which highly technical material is included to make sure I am explaining it right, but never the whole story. If the source is paying for words about them in the publication, then they can edit them beforehand. That’s called advertising.

2. We’re a big advertiser. Does that count for anything? Wince! Even if there is no intention to imply that because you’re an advertiser, therefore I should write about your company, the comment colors the whole rest of the conversation. When I worked for a business newspaper a few years ago, I trained myself to not even look at the ads because I didn’t want to know who was an advertiser. Sadly, some editors perk up when someone mentions they’re an advertiser, but none that I’ve ever worked for.

1. The unintended putdown. A variation on “I really wanted to go out with Linda,” this one covers the instance in which the PR person is trying to interest the publication but ends up insulting them. “We’ll give you a local exclusive on this. The Wall Street Journal is doing a piece, but we don’t view you as competitive.” Ouch. Also, “Sorry, we’re only briefing top tier media on this news.” Then why are you calling me?

Hope this helps. Again, most of the PR people I’ve worked with over the years have been far more professional than to commit these foot-in-mouth blunders, but the advice bears repeating. Call me any time with a pitch, but have these tips pinned up on your cubicle wall for reference.

11 comments to Top 10 PR No-nos, Part II

  • 1 of the greatest I have examine so far. The entire thing was properly thought of and properly written down. The most beneficial of luck in all your endeavors.

  • Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an very long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t appear. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyways, just wanted to say wonderful blog!

  • I’m commenting to make you understand what a amazing encounter my friend’s child found visiting your blog. She discovered a good number of pieces, most notably what it’s like to have an ideal teaching heart to let other people really easily thoroughly grasp chosen advanced topics. You actually did more than my expectations. Thank you for delivering such useful, trustworthy, revealing and fun tips on that topic to Emily.

  • Hi. I needed to drop you a quick note to express my thanks. Ive been following your blog for a month or so and have picked up a lot of excellent info and enjoyed the means youve structured your site. I’m making an attempt to run my very own blog however I assume its too general and I want to focus on additional smaller topics. Being all things to all or any folks is not all that its cracked up to be

  • After I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new feedback are added- checkbox and now each time a remark is added I get 4 emails with the identical comment. Is there any way youll be able to remove me from that service? Thanks!

  • The root of your writing while appearing agreeable at first, did not sit very well with me personally after some time. Someplace within the sentences you actually were able to make me a believer unfortunately just for a while. I nevertheless have got a problem with your leaps in logic and one would do well to fill in all those breaks. When you can accomplish that, I could surely be fascinated.

  • Wii

    Virtually all of the things you say happens to be astonishingly legitimate and that makes me wonder the reason why I hadn’t looked at this with this light previously. This piece truly did turn the light on for me personally as far as this specific subject goes. Nonetheless at this time there is one point I am not really too comfy with so while I try to reconcile that with the main idea of your position, let me see exactly what the rest of the visitors have to point out.Nicely done.

  • There are all very good things to consider when picking out a WordPress theme. Nice Post! Reply

  • Excellent site. Lots of useful info here. I?m sending it to some friends ans additionally sharing in delicious. And certainly, thanks in your sweat!

  • Great article, thanks for your time!